Personnel Certification

ISO/IEC 17024 Accreditation of Personnel Certification Bodies

UNA offers an internationally recognized accreditation program for the certification of persons. Accreditation scheme for the CAB has been developed as per the requirements of ISO/IEC 17024 standard to establish an internationally accepted benchmark for organizations assessing and evaluating the competence of personnel.

UNA Accreditation for Personnel Certification Bodies

  • Demonstrates compliance with ISO/IEC 17024.
  • Accreditation is accepted by regulators and the marketplace.
  • Provides verification that personnel certification schemes meet industry and/or international standards.
  • Helps organizations that certify individuals in a variety of occupations and professions to protect the integrity and ensure the validity of individual certification programs.
  • Promotes consumer and public confidence in the capabilities and competence of the people who provide specialized services.

UNA Criterion For Accreditation :

UNA lays down criteria for educational institutions established in internationally. Institutions need to implement and acquire standards of quality, successful application of which will provide accreditation license as per category follows :

Criterion I – Mission :

The institution’s mission and standard of education followed by it must be clear and understood by the public at large. The nature and scope of the institution must be articulated publicly. The institution’s emphasis on research, scholarship, instruction, academic programs must be known to the public in detail.

  1. The institution has a widely published mission statement—approved by its governing board—that articulates a purpose appropriate for an institution of higher learning, gives direction for its efforts, and derives from, and is generally understood by, its community.
  2. The institution defines mission fulfilment in the context of its purpose, characteristics, and expectations. Guided by that definition, it articulates institutional accomplishments or outcomes that represent an acceptable threshold or extent of mission fulfilment.

Criterion II – Integrity :

The institution operates with integrity to ensure the fulfilment of its mission through structures and processes that involve the board, administration, faculty, staff, and students.

  1. The institution’s governance and administrative structures promote effective leadership and support collaborative processes that enable the institution to fulfil its mission.
  2. The institution upholds and protects its integrity.

Criterion III – Student Learning and Effective Teaching :

The institution provides evidence of student learning and teaching effectiveness that demonstrates it is fulfilling its educational mission.

  1. The institution’s goals for student learning outcomes are clearly stated for each educational program and make effective assessment possible.
  2. The institution values and supports effective teaching.
  3. The institution creates effective learning environments.
  4. The institution’s learning resources support student learning and effective teaching.

Criterion IV – Application of Knowledge :

The institution promotes a life of learning for its faculty, administration, staff, and students by fostering and supporting inquiry, creativity, practice, and social responsibility in ways consistent with its mission.

  1. The institution demonstrates, through the actions of its board, administrators, students, faculty, and staff, that it values a life of learning.
  2. The institution demonstrates that acquisition of a breadth of knowledge and skills and the exercise of intellectual inquiry are integral to its educational programs.
  3. The institution assesses the usefulness of its curricula to students who will live and work in a global, diverse, & technological society.
  4. The institution provides support to ensure that faculty, students, and staff acquire, discover, and apply knowledge responsibly.

Criterion V – Resources, Planning, and Institutional Effectiveness :

The institution’s resources, structures, and processes are sufficient to fulfil its mission, improve the quality of its educational offerings, and respond to future challenges and opportunities. The institution plans for the future.

  1. The institution realistically prepares for a future shaped by multiple societal and economic trends.
  2. The institution’s resource base supports its educational programs and its plans for maintaining and strengthening their quality in the future.
  3. The institution’s ongoing evaluation and assessment processes provide reliable evidence of institutional effectiveness that clearly informs strategies for continuous improvement.
  4. All levels of planning align with the institution’s mission, thereby enhancing its capacity to fulfil that mission.